220 Triathlon · 14 de mayo de 2026 · por Charlie Allenby
Akaso Brave 7 LE action camera review: “proof that you don’t have to splash the cash if you want to record content!”
Can the wallet-friendly Akaso Brave 7 LE action camera live up to the performance of higher-end models? Tester Charlie Allenby finds out...

220 Triathlon Verdict
Definitely a good choice for those on a budget, but quality and footage could be better here
Pros
- Price
- Accessories and mounts at no extra cost
- Dual screen design
Cons
- Footage not as good as rivals
- Poor battery life
- App user interface tricky to use
Chinese brand Akaso is proof that you don’t have to splash the cash if you want to record content as you embark on your swims, rides and runs. Its Akaso 360 is a direct rival to the Insta360 X range, but its Brave 7 LE is worth focusing on because of its sub-£130 price tag.
For a fraction of the price of other models, you get a dual screen set-up like the DJI Osmo Action range, 40m waterproofing (although the included waterproof case is required) and video resolutions up to 4K30fps. It also has image stabilisation, a 4x zoom and an accompanying smartphone app where you can edit your footage. What’s more, you get an overwhelming number of accessories for no additional cost – including helmet mount, handlebar mount and a remote – making the Brave 7 LE even better value for money.
But while it clearly undercuts its rivals, at what cost to its capabilities as an action camera?
How we tested action cameras
We tested the DJI Osmo Action 6 alongside the Insta360 X5 and Go Ultra, riding them in various positions on the bike and manually holding them while running. We assessed their ease of use, weight, quality of video and stills, durability, battery life, accessories and value for money.
Out the box

On the surface, the Brave 7 LE looks somewhat dated. First released in 2020 but still in production, it hasn’t aged well in six years and is a bit bulky and cheap feeling compared to its more newer competitors. Its rear screen is a case in point – hemmed in by a wide, black frame, the area of the touchscreen that is actually functional accounts for about 75% of the screen, making navigating more fiddly than on rivals. A clunky user interface makes this even harder.
Mounting accessories is based around a threaded ¼” nut on the base of the camera, rather th…
Continúa leyendo el artículo completo
Sigue la noticia en 220 Triathlon
Por respeto al trabajo del medio y a los derechos de autor, mostramos solo un extracto. Lee la pieza completa en la fuente original.
Leer artículo completo en 220 TriathlonBIKEND es un agregador. Todos los derechos pertenecen a 220 Triathlon y a Charlie Allenby.
Sigue leyendo
Relacionados

Ingrid CRS-Trip Crankset
Italy’s Ingrid Components has long been a favorite over here. John reviewed the brand’s RD1 last year and dubbed it “Gucci,” and these all-new CRS-Trip cranks (from 286,07€) continue the Italian manufacturer’s legacy of making damn fine bike components… CRS-Trip Q…
por John Watson

La S-Works Epic 9 volvió a ganar en Nove Mesto: al detalle la bici de Laura Stigger
La nueva Specialized Epic 9 ya ha ganado las dos primeras pruebas de la Copa del Mundo XCO 2026. Analizamos a fondo la bicicleta de Laura Stigger en Nové Mě
por Ignacio P.
Giro Eclipse Pro Spherical Helmet
Comfortable, light and reassuringly aero, but pricey
por nick lodge

Hyrox myths busted: Former GB distance runner lifts the lid on runners’ Hyrox assumptions
With runners helping to drive the huge growth in Hyrox popularity, we put the five biggest running-Hyrox crossover myths to the test.
por 220 Triathlon Team